Reminder: There's never really been any evidence that the Trump campaign's digital ad targeting on Facebook was either an important factor in the campaign or was terribly effective.
-
-
-
Replying to @jululiis @NateSilver538
Website traffic from the ads, the number of impressions, the actions taken from the impressions (can be done with geofencing, utm links, dozen more ways). Example: it’s suspected that Russian hackers had 100m impressions. Compare to brands, that’s nothing
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
You can't track impressions via "utm links, geofencing or a dozen other ways". Impressions are a count of how many times an ad is served to users. There's no way to know what a person does after they log-off and go about their day. There's no way to know if they even saw the ad.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You can get 100m impression for maybe less than 100k depending on audience. I’ve spent $5m plus on Facebook ads and have gotten maybe 300-400m impressions and am considered tiny (barely even have an account manager at FB and am in the small business category).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Actually $100k might be a stretch on FB. But could do it on other ad networks. Could maybe get $3-5 cpm on FB so wound cost $300-500k.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.