Inadequate information 
Would you rather: own 100% of a business that grows 10-20% a year or 10% of something 3x-ing?
-
-
-
True. But people get it. It’s the SV raise and pray way vs, well, not the Sv way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Option A. Build a real business and have control.
-
Why is B not a real business?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It would seem: If you’re in it for the money, the former. If you’re in it for the impact, the latter. But given the law of exponential growth, the latter has a much bigger chance of being financially transformative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if all other things equal - 10% of something 3x'ing
-
Yup same here. Its upto the founders to ensure the 3Xing thing is also on it's way to being a real business. These are NOT mutually exclusive territories...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Option A
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The former provided you can retain your rockstars without equity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree with
@ShaanVP , assuming the owner(s) of the 90% had their stuff together and were a good team to work with.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.