No VCs: Whats good for society, provides living wages for a useful gig, and gives my investors reasonable returns/growth?
-
-
Replying to @danielornstein @AlexRubalcava
Don’t Uber, Facebook, Google, Snapchat, etc. all satisfy those conditions? They provide a valuable service, pay their engineers/staff really well and gave decent returns back
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kpourdeilami @AlexRubalcava
You’re kidding, right? Classifying employees as contractors is the antithesis of providing a living wage. The company isn’t profitable; the economics dont work until they raise prices and/or cut out the drivers.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @danielornstein @AlexRubalcava
Ok take Uber out for simplicity. Fb, google, amazon, etc. still satisfy those conditions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kpourdeilami @AlexRubalcava
Companies that have behaved irresponsibly and in anti-competitive fashion in order to satisfy insatiable growth demands.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @danielornstein @AlexRubalcava
Their pros outweigh the cons. Internet would be a lot worse without them
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Millions of small businesses have been created and thrive because of google fb and amazon. Do they mess up sometimes? Yup. But they created shareholder value and opportunists for the small guys that never existed.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
I don’t disagree. But I also know there’s plenty of room in the margins, esp given tax realities, to pay warehouse workers a living wage and convert contractors to employees. Founders and leadership would love to do do; VC and markets demand otherwise.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @danielornstein @theSamParr and
What’s your definition of “living wage?” If it’s Senator Sanders’ “Fight for $15” Amazon is already there. Also, your narrative blames the wrong group: 100% of Amazon’s revenue is driven by customers who decided they liked the value, and low prices are critical. Blame customers
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @markrhill @theSamParr and
Yes, consumers played a big part in rise of Amazon, but I don’t blame people for enjoying things that are too good to be true. My issue is with the playbook of getting users hooked with shortcuts & unsustainable economics (at first) to achieve total domination
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Ha. How Amazon too good to be true? It’s good. And it’s true. They raised the bar and their high level of execution and service is the benchmark.
-
-
Replying to @theSamParr @markrhill and
Amazon was too good to be true when most products were sold at negative margin. Suppose you also think Netflix is true?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danielornstein @theSamParr and
Next time, numbers, not narrative please. https://ycharts.com/companies/AMZN/gross_profit_margin …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.