Je kan informatie over je locatie aan je Tweets toevoegen, bijvoorbeeld je stad of exacte locatie, via het web en applicaties van derden. Je kan altijd de locatiegeschiedenis van je Tweets verwijderen. Meer informatie
small game design thing I've been learning: giving the player a ton of things to do and making them figure out how to progress sucks. good "open" design still shows a clear objective, and then also lots of other fun/intruiging things to do that distract from the critical path
it feels like giving the players lots of stuff to play with directionlessly will let them appreciate all the elements at their own pace, but usually it does the opposite. it's frustrating cuz they don't know what they're supposed to do and that can be where the game loses them
when the player knows what they're "supposed" to do, they get to make a fun choice. if they're enjoying the game, they'll really enjoy getting to decide for themselves to take the long way and explore where they dont need to/where they werent asked to
or, conversely, if they're exhausted/feeling lost, they always know an easy, direct path to progress. sometimes that's really what you need. maybe this is obvious to many of you but it absolutely wasn't to me, I keep relearning this (and seeing it messed up in other titles).
i know a few people who bounced off BotW for exactly this reason and it's a shame
I felt like botw does this really well! (that's what inspired me to think about this). super-visible map towers from far away and constant map markers to the next story objective... ignoring those is such an intentional, fun choice to get to make (for me anyways)
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
