Why are so many of us concerned about the SJW movement in ostensibly “evangelical” contexts? Great example: MBTS staffer thinking the conflict in Gal. 2 has absolutely ANYTHING to do with “race.” Stunning how fast this has happened, and how deep it goes!https://twitter.com/jaredcwilson/status/1053355398676144128 …
-
-
Replying to @DrOakley1689
It seems to me that race was very much an issue in this chapter. While the primary emphasis is on the nature of the Gospel itself (is it faith alone or faith + works?), I think there is more going on. Peter was allowing racial identity to take precedence over the Gospel.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @1689Millennial @DrOakley1689
If that were the case, Paul would have rebuked Peter for racism; however, Paul's rebuke, is limited to the issue works vs faith. *Circumcision* was the issue, and that's clear to all, except those who've imbibed too much Keller.
4 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @thatbrian @DrOakley1689
How can you say that circumcision was the issue and not admit that race is involved in at least some way? Circumcision/uncircumcision has everything to do with race. If you were circumcised, you were Jewish. If you weren't, you were Gentile.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
How? Because circumcision was a religious matter, not a racial one. Muslims don't hate Christians because Christians are "white". They hate Christians because we are, "Infidels". We are idolators and law-breakers, in their eyes. This isn't "racism" by anyone's definition.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
