Michael Bishop

@thatMikeBishop

social data scientist. I like forecasting, causal inference, economics, sociology, immigration, being a dad. Working with

Vrijeme pridruživanja: veljača 2010.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @thatMikeBishop

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @thatMikeBishop

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    The USA's three most dysfunctional sectors (healthcare, education, and law) are also its most licensed, with licensure rates above even Germany (EU's most licensed) and FAR above that of the Nordics (least licensed).

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    What do we mean by replication? We have a new definition! "Replication is testing the same claim using data that was not used in the original study." Read about the implications of this change on our blog:

    Poništi
  3. 22. sij
    Poništi
  4. 17. sij

    In surveys, it's great to ask questions that have correct answers. They serve as proxies for knowledge and conscientious, and they can do much more if chosen well.

    Poništi
  5. 12. sij

    What are you doing this afternoon... Share your evaluation of some social science claims!

    Poništi
  6. 31. pro 2019.

    "If you miss the best-performing seed investment, you will eventually be outperformed by someone who blindly invests in every credible deal." --should be written in past tense. True in last 10 years data but buyer-beware out-of-sample prediction

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. pro 2019.

    It's not that I *like* measurement. It's that I like finding out the truth about things and you can't do that without good measurement.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 19. pro 2019.

    Retweets appreciated! We cover all social sciences and hope this project leads to improve transparency and reliability throughout.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 19. pro 2019.

    , needs you to "bet" on the replicability of articles from AJS, ASR, JMF, Crim, etc. articles by this Sunday! To register: or for info:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 18. pro 2019.
    Poništi
  11. 7. pro 2019.

    perhaps the lack of replies indicates the answer is "no"

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 3. pro 2019.

    Join to improve social science and predict the results of research replication efforts. Thanks to for helping extend our invitation to participate:

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. pro 2019.
    Poništi
  14. 13. stu 2019.
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. stu 2019.

    In academic social debate, I like: * substantive critique * politeness * assuming good faith I am OK with: * blunt critique I don’t like: * personal criticism (unless the criticism is *about* that person’s behavior) * disrespect for persons and identities

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 31. lis 2019.

    How would you even conceptualize the external validity of a study when internal validity is lacking?

    Poništi
  17. 30. lis 2019.

    A follow-up poll for Answer if you have published quantitative empirical research: If independent researchers attempted to directly replicate your study's procedures with new data, what share of the major claims would successfully replicate?

    Poništi
  18. 28. lis 2019.

    Please tell me jeopardy isn't this misleading about the topics I don't know something about 😰

    Poništi
  19. 28. lis 2019.

    Yes, and we can consider more optimistic frames: individuals use culture and networks to create and enjoy the marvels of the modern world.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. lis 2019.

    Bruce Schneier on how insecure electronic voting could break the United States — and surveillance without tyranny:

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·