Cutting women to control them is abhorrent. It matters to me.https://twitter.com/KarenJewel/status/1051165901666639872 …
and there are also similarities: both are non therapeutical surgery performed in infants, so both are mutilation. So I suppose that you think there are absolutely zero reasons to defend male circumcision.
-
-
That is not true.The benefits outweigh the risk of Male Circumcision .This the CDChttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/male-circumcision-benefits-outweigh-risks-cdc-says/ …
-
Circumcision without consent is sexual adsault... Women who circumcised their sons are worse than rapists..
-
@MgtowRadical you seem to be obsessed with the subject of circumcision. -
I'm not the one that when having his newborn son in arms, the first thing he/she thinks about is in chopping his genitals. Who are the obsesseds?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interview to Dr. Freedman, (AAP circumcision task force) -So you’re not actually advocating circumcision? -No, we’re not. Circumcision cuts across cultural, religious, medical and aesthetic lines. We don’t see ourselves as partisan in the battle over circumcision
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Male circumcision has been shown to have health benefits and doesn't damage sexual function, or pleasure. Whereas female genital mutilation has no health benefits and is actually designed to damage sexual pleasure, and often causes lifetime pain. There are striking differences.
-
and bloody similarities when performed without therapeutical reasons in infants.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.