Opens profile photo
Follow
Jeff Sackmann
@tennisabstract
Tennis history, data, and analytics.
the 1910stennisabstract.comJoined September 2009

Jeff Sackmann’s Tweets

Not shocking given the remaining draws, but interesting to see that according to my forecasts, Alcaraz (76%) has a better chance of winning the Madrid title than Swiatek (72%) does, despite have one more round to go.
1
2
Time to update our list of the longest Challenger matches on record (since 2010) 1. 2011 B'quilla R2 Cipolla-Farah 4h23 2. 2023 Savannah R1 Hemery-Galarneau 4h21 3. 2022 Lima QF Etcheverry-Olivo 4h17 4. 2023 Cagliari QF Humbert-Daniel 4h16 5. 2012 Guayaquil SF Lorenzi-RRH 4h07
2
9
Show this thread
Legends galore on this list. Both Cipolla-Farah and Machac-Olivo had a 7-5 set. Lorenzi-RRH was previously the longest three-tiebreak special. Only six CH matches in the last 13+ years have crossed the four-hour mark.
1
7
Show this thread
I have (most) Challenger match times back to 2010. Looks like its the second longest: 1. 2011 Barranquilla R2 Cipolla d. Farah, 4h23 2. 2023 Savannah R1 Hemery. d Galarneau 4h21 3. 2022 Lima QF Machac d. Olivo 4h17 4. 2012 Guayaquil SF Lorenzi d Ramirez Hidalgo 4h07
Quote Tweet
.@ATPChallenger Is 4:21 the longest Challenger match on record? I know it's not longest ever, 4:41 appears there.
2
24
Show this thread
With the Barcelona title (and Djokovic's loss), Carlos Alcaraz reclaims to the top spot on the Elo ranking table. He also has a significant lead in the clay-specific Elo ratings.
Image
3
37
Botic had 5-2, 40-15 in the third set. Assuming for simplicity that the players were equal at that point, his chances of winning were 99.5%. Using my pre-match Elo ratings, Rune had a much better shot; Botic's odds at the first match point were a mere 99.2%.
Quote Tweet
I’d love to know the actual statistical odds of coming back from this. It must be incredibly low cc @tennisabstract twitter.com/vanshv2k/statu…
Show this thread
1
18
Not a 500, but worth adding that Kecmanovic pulled this off in Estoril a few weeks ago. Also: I limited this to the last ten years, but if we go back three more, we can count Rafa's 2010 Monte Carlo, where he entered the final with 30 return games, 20 of them breaks.
5
Show this thread
On this day in 1973: 16-year-old Nick Saviano triumphed at the prestigious Easter Bowl junior tournament, then held at Tennis 59 in Manhattan. The 14-and-under champ? A promising lefty from Queens named John McEnroe.
1
8
The difference btw top 100s is also a bigger deal than it sounds. A core of 6 events offer equal opps (slams+iw+miami). Another 4 biggies are equal-ish. Take those out, and the 23.7 to 18.5 (ranks 31-50) is 13.7 to 8.5. More than half-again as many opps for men in those weeks.
9
Show this thread
The big gap is in Challenger level opportunities. Comparing tourneys in the $50k-plus range (men's CHs, women's CHs + ITF $60K+) ranked 151-200: men got 17.5 direct entries, women got 9.9. ranked 201-250: men 18.1, women 8.6 ranked 251-300: 14.2, women 7.1
1
16
Show this thread
I had expected that the women ranked 51-100 spent more time in qualies/challs/ITFs than similarly ranked men, but that wasn't really the case -- both genders in that ranking range got main draw direct entries for a bit more than 60% of the tourneys they played.
1
20
Show this thread
A propos of this week's limited options for WTAers, just did a quick tally of playing opportunities in 2022. Players ranked 11-30: - men entered an average of 22.6 events - women 19.1 Ranked 31-50: - men entered 23.7 - women 18.5 Ranked 51-100: - men entered 26 - women 22.5
15