being too rational and first principles, ive found alienates people they want to feel special
-
Show this thread
-
im disappointed and angry in myself, in how obvious this ought to be tweet above applied is general barrier is worse when they rationalise via feeling or rather the "logic" that guides their action is feeling orientated emotional associations seem alien to me
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
"Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲 Retweeted Δ
what i mean by "special" is that everyone is the hero of their own hero mythhttps://twitter.com/allouitiously/status/1023868367634145280 …
"Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
To a low-decoupler, high-decouplers’ ability to fence off any threatening implications looks like a lack of empathy to a high-decoupler the low-decouplers insistence that this isn’t possible looks like naked bias and an inability to think straighthttps://everythingstudies.com/2018/05/25/decoupling-revisited/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
"Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲 Retweeted "Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲
this is another problem i presume was going to tweet via first principles you can look at and argue priori and posteriori positions for and against the very notion of human rights https://twitter.com/GRITCULT/status/1028011922959097856 … degrees of belief manifested
"Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲 added,
"Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲 @GRITCULTinhumanity is just a meme how much a meme is enforced in reality, is measured in degrees "how democratic is X" "is democracy working?" "democracy doesnt mean universal suffrage" its depends and is subjective too memes vary, node to node of which they inhabit node=mind https://twitter.com/unabom_tweets/status/1027979654500675585 …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
"Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲 Retweeted ha[I]ku's for compilers.
thank https://twitter.com/codetoshi/status/1028081694635687937 … come to see politics (communication) as manifestation of identity identity is tribal tribalism is biology biology differs, how minds work working on my ability to infer peoples mental models & extrapolate say how a INFP thinks contrast to ENTJ
"Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲 added,
ha[I]ku's for compilers. @codetoshiThis really accurately lays out what I call the hyper-nuances of the right/left/PC situation(and many other issues that intersect therein). It's really damned hard to have a argument that must be highly decoupled to achieve results, over lowly decoupled ideas. Well done. https://twitter.com/GRITCULT/status/1024739475824500739 …1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
"Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲 Retweeted Tell Schwartzenegger 💪🏽 💪🏽
stoicism, i believe, may have also pushed me to first principles, scrutinous logic and ruthless rationalityhttps://twitter.com/tellfisher/status/1024402175970164744 …
"Spooky" Žh∴ 🌲 added,
Tell Schwartzenegger 💪🏽 💪🏽 @tellfisherI've noticed this a lot with 140+ IQ people. They have a lot of good things to say. True things. But they are so idealistic and first principle based that no one connects with them. They get frustrated because they know they're right.. but they are so misunderstood. https://twitter.com/GRITCULT/status/1023808802330734592 …Show this thread2 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread
Honestly I think I'd say the same has happened to me. It's not a bad way of thinking and rationalizing. Just remeber when you are talking to the general population, they will more than likely not resonate with you. If you want to truly touch people, speak their language.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.