You're using warped interpretations of the law and are being entirely hypocritical from a purely non-legal ethical perspective...
it seems to me like that's intended for maintainers of subsystems / stable trees, for the case where an existing patch mail is changed?
-
-
afaics the part above it says that for external GPL'ed code, the origin should be stated "in the file"
-
Yes, and the origin in this case is PaX. There's no expectation of tracking the whole history and attributing it to specific individuals.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.