That's not a lie. There's no attribution given in current patches. If past, out-of-past credit is all you think is required that's done.
The condition is that the original source of the code is "indicated in the file", whatever "file" means in that context?
-
-
some of the relevant parts are quoted in spender's mail earlier today.
-
it seems to me like that's intended for maintainers of subsystems / stable trees, for the case where an existing patch mail is changed?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.