So, internet: can we agree to kill the navigate-to-a-string side-effects of `<a href="javascript:'Hi!'">click</a>`? It's nuts, right?
-
-
Replying to @mikewest
right. Definitely for top level window. Used in ad tech as iframe srcdoc polyfill without doc.write.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @mikewest @cramforce
but that's not an issue for modern browsers, right? as long as only browsers with srcdoc support make the change?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
in theory :) I'd be totally in favor of removing this. Very surprising feature with no real use.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cramforce
: Two (2) percent of page views. TWO. https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/215 …
@tehjh1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
GPT has a thing called "safe frame" that uses it for most ads. I bet that is 1.9% of all usages.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cramforce
: http://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/SafeFrames_v1.1_final.pdf … ? So you're saying it's not
@hillbrad's fault?@tehjh1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
ugh, might be it. I misremembered the feature it abused. It’s http://window.name :)pic.twitter.com/pyhRriPjsR
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
maybe you were thinking of this, whatever that is? https://www.google.de/search?q=%27%22%3Chtml%3E%3Cbody+style%3D%27background%3Atransparent%27%3E%3C%2Fbody%3E%3C%2Fhtml%3E%22%27 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.