"CAs that do not revoke might be excluded. CAs might also be excluded based on empirical measures of suspicious activity. The certificate should tell the user whether they are safe/secure, if this is done wrong the CAs might be excluded." totally not trying to throw shade on LE
-
-
...I don't suppose we live in a just world in which there is video of this?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sleevi_ @ryancdotorg and
brb joining CAB Forum.pic.twitter.com/Zs7y8aK6dj
2 replies 6 retweets 25 likes -
I call dibs on one called "Yet Another Low Effort Chromium Fork" that blocks certs issued by Comodo with some even more absurd warning.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ryancdotorg @sleevi_ and
In all seriousness I wonder how well it would go over if I did make at least a half-assed attempt to fork Chromium, make some crappy website for it, register an LLC, and ask to be in the forum.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
I believe the last time this came up, someone mentioned there's no rule requiring one to have a business as a browser member. Attempting to join with a transparent "search-and-replace + compile" Chromium fork would be entertaining.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ryancdotorg @vcsjones and
Also, I think there is no weighting of votes, so Comodo's already getting as much say as Chrome on the browser side (unless they count as two browsers).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
wow, that is a *great* meme image
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.