They are not required to come up with rules for universal use, the society of today presents new, unique and complex threats to peace and minorities, they do monitor content and after quiet a lengthy inhouse debate delete content/ban scumbags, its not whimsical but prudent.
-
-
Replying to @teg_jamshed @sweats_actual and
Actually, as a platform they are. Otherwise, that would open up discrimination lawsuits to all platforms. Unless you are daft enough to want phone companies to have the ability to ban your phone service simply because they do not like you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RedBloodedGuy @sweats_actual and
Phone calls are private, one's social media accounts are public, thats difference, Twitter does not have a vendetta against conservatives, they dont even know these scumbags, who grew like mushrooms in a few years. Tech companies judge the content and on that basis hand out ban.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @sweats_actual and
I’m talking about banning the person. That’s what these companies are arbitrarily doing. And of course Twitter has a vendetta against conservatives.
@Project_Veritas did an entire expose on them. You clearly need to do more research.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RedBloodedGuy @sweats_actual and
Exactly what provision in any code or law binds them to provide a platform to anyone ? they are not obliged to even be rational, they are their own company they can run their own house as they deem fit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @sweats_actual and
I’m sorry, I mistook you for someone who had a reading comprehension over a 3rd grade level. I’m not going to keep reexplaining it to you if you cannot comprehend this issue here. But if you actually have honest questions about this subject then read this:https://www.city-journal.org/html/platform-or-publisher-15888.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RedBloodedGuy @sweats_actual and
Dont be sorry, your link felt totally out of order and partisan, i found other sources that approved of my view, but i did't thew them at your face. coz these matters are different to different people, the bottom line is these companies are not sued and that is an affirmative nod
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @RedBloodedGuy and
Except they have been sued... As pointed out above.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sweats_actual @RedBloodedGuy and
Successfully** that is what i meant, right ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @RedBloodedGuy and
Because they are not treated as publishers, despite acting increasingly as such, which is the whole point of the initial comment. Guessing you missed that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That is your opinion, tech companies have incurred no legal liability, that is a fact. so dear boy they will continue to smite the despicables 
-
-
Replying to @teg_jamshed @RedBloodedGuy and
I know kindergartners who can insult better than you. Try harder.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
pro-EU.
EE:
Barry Evans
Billy & Ronnie Mitchell
Dean Wicks
Johnny Allen
Lucas Johnson
Nick Cotton
Derek, Abi & Tanya Branning Fan.