The Constitution does not. The legal code does.
-
-
Replying to @sweats_actual @RedBloodedGuy and
Show me the definition of "platform" in the legal code of any state.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @RedBloodedGuy and
You have the internet, you can do the research.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sweats_actual @RedBloodedGuy and
Yeah i did, and it does not exists, you lied. Definition of "platform" does not exists, If you right wingers do not agree with Youtube, then push off. make your own streaming service and remain there.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @RedBloodedGuy and
You didn't do a lot of research. Nice try though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sweats_actual @RedBloodedGuy and
Dude stop lying, do not be a LAIR, if Youtube was a in the wrong with legal code, then these rightwing nutters be suing its ass off in SC.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @sweats_actual and
This has nothing to do with the Constitution other than there was a section of an act established to protect First Amendment rights from the federal government. Read Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RedBloodedGuy @sweats_actual and
Pikachueevie Retweeted Sweats
That law protects YT's right to delete accounts and videos and doesn't support the tweet below at all.https://twitter.com/sweats_actual/status/1139892090547122176 …
Pikachueevie added,
Sweats @sweats_actualReplying to @teg_jamshed @RedBloodedGuy and 2 othersNothing says they can't, but once you start picking and choosing which content to allow you cease to be a platform and begin to be a publisher. Right now many social media sites argue they are platforms, not publishers, and are exempt from certain regulations. 1/22 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pikachuevie @RedBloodedGuy and
Indeed, YT & Twitter can delete content ban accounts as they deem fit, they are not required to provide services to anyone they wish not to be associated with. thats the bottom line These screams need to stop, "conservatives" can start their own 'no rules' tumptube & trumptter
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @pikachuevie and
Clearly you do not understand the provisions or statutes of the law, son. If they are going to curate content willy nilly they can be open to lawsuits like a publisher. It’s not a matter of whether they can or cannot delete content.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
They have been deleting accounts for a long time now, why have these nutters not knocked on SC's door then ?
-
-
Replying to @teg_jamshed @pikachuevie and
Just because they have gotten away with it this long does not set a precedent that grants them this authority.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RedBloodedGuy @pikachuevie and
What gem of a situation ! gotta hand it to you, only conservatives can have such self-paralyzing attitude
, coz the situation seems to work for Tech companies either way.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
pro-EU.
EE:
Barry Evans
Billy & Ronnie Mitchell
Dean Wicks
Johnny Allen
Lucas Johnson
Nick Cotton
Derek, Abi & Tanya Branning Fan.