YouTube banned a vegan dude who rescued pigeons and produced carefully worded content specifically designed not to violate their TOS. No reason given.
Ludicrous and proof of flagrant partisan censorship of conservatives.
RT if you think @TeamYouTube should restore his account.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @PrisonPlanet @TeamYouTube
@TeamYouTube should restore a lot of the accounts and videos that they have removed.1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
They shouldn't be banning anything, or they should be treated as a publisher.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sweats_actual @RedBloodedGuy and
Under what law are they not allowed to ban a scumbag ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @RedBloodedGuy and
Nothing says they can't, but once you start picking and choosing which content to allow you cease to be a platform and begin to be a publisher. Right now many social media sites argue they are platforms, not publishers, and are exempt from certain regulations. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sweats_actual @RedBloodedGuy and
If they were treated as a publisher, these sites could then be held civilly, and in some cases criminally, liable for the content they allow. They could also be subject to libel and defamation suits, which they are currently exempted from due to not being a publisher. 2/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
What law says that once you ban a scumbag you cease to be a "platform" ? does US constitution or for that matter any constitution define "platform" ?
-
-
Replying to @teg_jamshed @RedBloodedGuy and
The Constitution does not. The legal code does.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 19 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
pro-EU.
EE:
Barry Evans
Billy & Ronnie Mitchell
Dean Wicks
Johnny Allen
Lucas Johnson
Nick Cotton
Derek, Abi & Tanya Branning Fan.