Conversation

(2/2) Rather than insults, try civil discussion of facts. Fact 1: until 2015, the FCC had NO authority over Internet. The Net grew free & unregulated. Fact 2: W/ "net neutrality" the FCC declared power to regulate everything said & done on Internet. That's really bad for freedom.

Quote Tweet

Mark Hamill

@MarkHamill

Dec 17, 2017

Thanks for smarm-spaining it to me @tedcruz I know politics can be confusing, but you'd have more credibility if you spelled my name correctly. I mean IT'S RIGHT THERE IN FRONT OF YOU! Maybe you're just distracted from watching porn at the office again

-mh twitter.com/tedcruz/status

10:11 PM · Dec 17, 2017

Replying to

Oh sure, you fire the first shot, look like a complete horse's ass and NOW you don't want insults?

Replying to

Enjoy your last year in office.

Jeremy Wein is in NYC

@thismyshow

Dec 18, 2017

Replying to

@tedcruz

Fact 3: Net Neutrality was implemented because ISP were abusing their positions and blocking content and slowing down other content, idiot

Replying to

Fact 1: The Net Neutrality was designed to keep the internet free and unregulated. Fact 2: Your twitter porn will load more slowly unless you spend an extra $5/month.

Replying to

“Rather than insults”, says person who started conversation about #netneutrality by calling critics “snowflakes”. 🙄

Replying to

Hammill played an alien in a science fiction movie. Go easy on him Ted. He's a dim bulb.

Replying to

@HamillHimself “Civil discussion”

563

Replying to

and

Everyone knows you’re a Sith, Senator. Probably even you.

383

Replying to

It’s not a fuckig baby until it is born. Until then it is a lifeless parasitic fetus with no thoughts, memory, eyesight, knowledge, emotions, feelings, sense of touch, poltical opinion, friends, a twitter account, a birth certificate, a social security number, a LIFE.

i tried ⋆

@Shpow

Dec 18, 2017

What's the $36.97 stuff coming from? You realise people want #NetNeutrality to prevent cable companies from making you pay bundles to cover apps, right?

Kyle and 8,732 others

Replying to

It's easier to argue against net neutrality when you don't actually know what it is. Hence the snarky $39.67 or whatever stupid amount he's using