point to one single credible piece of evidence supporting your position
Two points on the “enemies list”: (1) calling for a fair, credible audit of claims of serious election fraud is DEFENDING the integrity of our democracy, and (2) some of us remember when Reich (rightly) wrote “Don’t Democrats Believe in Democracy?” https://prospect.org/article/democrats-believe-democracy/ …https://twitter.com/RBReich/status/1345507450930176001 …
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Cruz continue your work !
-
Subverting the will of the voters is not work.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” George Orwell
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sixty times courts ruled against election fraud. What you are doing is called sedition, it's a crime.
@FBI law and order! -
Lol I wouldn’t hold your breathe for the FBI. They seem to be disinterested in prosecuting anybody for literally anything, least of all voter fraud.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
For a guy that read constitutional law at Harvard, you seem unwilling to believe what the courts of the United states have said... over 60 times. That there was no fraud. So we can conclude that you are lying. Once again.
-
Name one of those court cases that have had a hearing where evidence has been heard.... I'll wait.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.