1/x Calling out lies is not silence. NYT explicitly admits the 1619 project is revisionist history: “It aims to reframe our country’s history.” It is filled with serious errors—which have been called out by top historians—but the NYT doesn’t care. You’re not after truth.... https://twitter.com/nhannahjones/status/1302612605014597633 …
-
-
8/x NYT: "[O]ne of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare independence was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery." ALL FALSE. And thoroughly debunked by accomplished historians like Gordon Wood & James McPherson.
Show this thread -
9/x So, no, I don’t want to “cancel” the NYT. I want y’all to stop behaving like Marxist propagandists, stop peddling falsehoods to children, and behave instead like real journalists.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s all b.s. The 1619 project is a Fantasy that never happened.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really? I thought it said..."that all men are created equal..." in a place where people owned other people. If signing up to a declaration that said that wasn't living a lie in those circumstances, i don't know what it was.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.