You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Under the standard put forth by the House Democrats today – that any potential fact witness cannot serve as counsel in the impeachment hearing – there is an obvious person who should be disqualified: Adam Schiff.
Schiff, it has been alleged, spoke directly with the so-called "whistle-blower" and may even have helped him draft the complaint that launched this entire impeachment.
So, maybe we should disqualify Schiff as a lawyer, and schedule him instead as a witness to explain his role in creating the "evidence" in this proceeding?
Senator Cruz, why can't some of these Democrats be charged with treason, or sedition at the very least?
Eric Ciaramella... not a whistleblower, but an embedded Deep State spy in the WH... for entrapment
Schiff's spy picked up a "leak trap"and took it to Schiff for impeachment.
Schiff can't hear you. He's busy trying to find a hat that fits.pic.twitter.com/rmZmzdevQr
Doubtful, but if it occurred, how would it in any way affect the facts of the case? Not at all.
It has been alleged. It's also been proven bunk.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
