I think I have figured out why I am so uneasy with the UG article. Hear me out. God I hope this comes out right. It's because it felt, to me, like victim-blaming & not 'root cause'. Or at least, blaming the wrong people and wrong targets.
-
-
Now, sorry, don't get me wrong. I am 100% not advocating for using people in this way. I hope this comes out the way I intended. I am saying that it is only natural that we would elevate trans voices, because otherwise we'd be written off completely.
Show this thread -
It upsets me that radical feminism isn't seen as a body of thought worthy of listening to in its own right. It upsets me that feminism has been hijacked by the likes of Jameela Jamil. But BE HONEST. Having GC trans people on our side HELPS US.
Show this thread -
Now, look, it's shitty that I even have to talk about other human beings in this way. I'm sorry if it comes out wrong. But radical feminism is about root causes, correct?
Show this thread -
In this instance, the root cause of this division is the threats and authoritarianism of gender extremists and TRAs, who brand us as transphobic (not true) or ignorant (not true) or "lived experience" etc. THEY ARE TO BLAME. It's only natural to then try to prove them wrong.
Show this thread -
Much like being against prostitution and porn is about root causes and not attacking the individuals, but critiquing the patriarchal context that choices are made in, that article was making judgements about individuals making less than ideal choices, but UNDERSTANDABLE ones.
Show this thread -
So it wasn't looking at the root cause. It was ignoring the reality that having transwomen as allies HELPS US. They let us wear them as a shield. And for that we should be grateful. The root cause is the threats from TRAs. The culprits are TRAs.
Show this thread -
And that's why I took issue with the article - because radical feminism is about identifying root causes, but this one didn't do that. So, can we please stop singling out individuals for making imperfect decisions in a hostile situation?
Show this thread -
I wish we could just be heard without having to keep proving we aren't evil bigots. That article is a TRA's dream come true, the anti-feminist's dream come true, and lays blame at the feet of women who are being punched from every fucking direction.
Show this thread -
Can we lay blame where it belongs? Which is at the foot of every person who forces reluctant and rational GC trans people to be used as a football, and women to have to trot out their trans friends like Pokemon in order to be heard? THE ROOT CAUSE. God I hope I said this right.
Show this thread -
The fact is, we WIN THE ARGUMENT. Hands down. But we only win if the argument gets heard. When we are accused of bigotry and transphobia and hate, nobody listens. So, GC trans & men, thank you for helping us with this. But yeah, give more women credit, airtime & money. lol.
Show this thread -
The fact of the matter is under patriarchy, women don't get heard on our own. Whether its allying with the prohibitionists for DV, or having men defend us, or Christians or trans allies. Suddenly women have a voice that gets heard? WE NEED ALLIES TO BE HEARD. Love youse.
Show this thread -
Laughing at the idea that the Australian has to come in and be the hybrid between the US & UK. haha fucken typical
Show this thread -
PS just for clarity's sake: I am not a Gender Critical Feminist. I am, and always have been, a Feminist. It's a broad school with lots of complex perspectives. You don't own Feminism any more than fucking Butler does, so please go and create the No-Homers if clubs are your thing.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.