I just published What does it mean for a machine to ‘understand’? https://link.medium.com/vvNZ4pks80 1/
-
-
Today's AI systems exhibit some understanding. For example, when I tell Siri “Call Carol” and it dials the correct number, you will have a hard time convincing me that Siri did not understand my request. 3/
Prikaži ovu nit -
But as many folks have pointed out, today's AI systems lack many forms of understanding. Such critics often claim that Siri's understanding is not "true", "real" or "genuine". But I argue that it is "real", and it can be measured functionally. 4/
Prikaži ovu nit -
Why does this matter? Because the CS community has a history of dismissing advances in AI as not being "real" and declaring the entire AI enterprise to be a failure. Funding dries up, and research progress slows. 5/
Prikaži ovu nit -
Today, despite the critics, AI R&D continues to deliver useful functionality to users. So let’s stop dismissing our successes as “fake” and not “genuine”, and let’s continue to move forward with honesty and productive self-criticism. 6/
Prikaži ovu nit -
Speaking of productive self-criticism. When we demonstrate a new capability, let's also demonstrate its limits by showing instances of functional failures. Much of the criticism is a reaction to the hype generated by researchers and the organizations they work for. 7/
Prikaži ovu nit -
It is important, both for intellectual honesty and for continued funding, that AI researchers claim credit for our successes and take ownership of our shortcomings. end/
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The fact that a category could exist in a gradual scale is not in contradiction with the existence of elements outside the category. When I say current implementations do not match the concept of understanding it doesn’t make understanding binary
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
This cannot be stressed enough: the functionalist view is only an initial, very shallow phase, as shown by the history around Turing Tests. Without overcoming the functionalist approach to processes we will be limited in our progress, focusing on advanced imitators
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
A truly binary predicate such as “understanding <x> for purpose <y>” should work for the approach that you are describing (eg. understanding “call XXX” for the purpose of dialing) if I understood it correctly?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.