* there is some question about whether the resolution is legally binding. I can write up more details when I have time. The bylaw consultors are consulting the bylaws; you know how it is.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
However, this is undeniably a big step, and I'm very grateful and excited that we got here.
Prikaži ovu nit -
We also banned the Alameda County Sheriffs, for their militaristic attack on
@moms4housing (they don't have a contingent but some officers march in SFPD's contingent) and another resolution I honestly can't remember nowPrikaži ovu nit -
Oh right. One issue is, Google's contract with Pride might be a multi-year contract. But we don't know and the org is forbidden from telling us.https://twitter.com/laurenceb/status/1217702488490438662 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
Now that we've passed the resolution Laurence mentioned, they will (we hope!) tell us.
Prikaži ovu nit -
I shouldn't tweet when I'm super tired. I'm realizing now that it's not clear from these tweets: the same asterisk applies to the banning of the sheriffs.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Honest question, Bann from participating sf pride, is this for the pride event or the group? Also how do you Bann a company? :/ I am not aware of what has happened, this popped on my feed and asking.
-
I probably should have waited to write up a more detailed explanation but I was a little bit too excited. Sorry for the confusion. See follow-up tweets from me and
@laurenceb for now, and there will probably be a fuller explanation available soon.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Now can we get Amazon, the big banks, insurance companies, out of pride? I mean... look at the list of sponsors, like maybe a handful deserve to be there:http://www.sfpride.org/sponsor/
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.