Tax FoundationOvjeren akaunt

@taxfoundation

America's leading tax policy resource, informing smarter tax policy at the federal, state, and global levels since 1937. Subscribe to weekly tax updates ⬇️

Washington, DC
Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2008.
Rođen/a 5. prosinca 1937.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @taxfoundation

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @taxfoundation

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    ANALYSIS: Sen. Warren & Sen. Sanders' would raise significantly less revenue than promised, face administrative and compliance challenges, and would double the trade deficit while increasing foreign ownership of US capital.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. Our analysis looks at a wealth tax in isolation, but both Sen. Warren and Sen. Sanders have proposed a range of tax changes that could combine to have more extreme effects on the economy and that could even tax portions of the same base, further reducing available revenue. /end

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. A wealth tax would increase the types of spending it's designed to curb 💵 A wealth tax would encourage some to consume their wealth as rapidly as possible and in less productive ways than they may otherwise, including increased donations to PACs. /10

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. A wealth tax would directly shrink investment in the pass-through sector, leading to a permanent reduction in the level of GDP growth, fewer jobs, and lower wages: /9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. A wealth tax could result in massive dislocations in manufacturing and other industries that would disproportionately impact rural Americans: /8

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. Foreigners would own more US capital 🌎 A wealth tax would lead to a dramatic reduction of domestic saving, which would be replaced by foreign investors. The ownership of many US assets would shift from home-grown billionaires to foreign billionaires /7

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. A wealth tax would face serious administrative and compliance challenges 📋 An annual wealth tax necessitates determining the market value of all taxable assets net liabilities every year: /6

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. A low wealth tax rate is equivalent to a high-rate income tax 📈 Compared to income taxes, wealth tax rates seem much low, but can result in confiscatory effective tax rates exceeding 100%. Wealth taxes would also fall heaviest on risk-averse savers. /5

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. The numbers don't add up ❌ We find that both wealth tax plans will raise significantly less revenue than promised (only about 60% of what the Warren and Sanders campaigns project): /4

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. In our new report out last week, we explain the basics of a wealth tax by comparing it against the current individual income tax, review other countries' experiences with one, and model the economic impact that Warren and Sanders' proposed wealth taxes could have for the US. /3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. Wealth taxes on ultra-wealthy households have been proposed by Democratic presidential candidates to fight against inequality and raise extra revenue, but there is substantial uncertainty about how much revenue can be raised and how a wealth tax could impact the U.S. economy. /2

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly’s Fiscal Year 2021 budget and tax proposals can be targeted to effectively restructure Kansas’ tax base. Here's how:

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 1 sat

    D.C. False Claims Act Bill Raises Legal and Practical Concerns

    Poništi
  14. Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) rules in Spain are not as complicated as they is in some other countries, and they are aligned with the standards recommended by the OECD:

    Poništi
  15. Iowa Governor proposes second round of tax reform:

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 4 sata

    New today: state individual income tax rates, brackets, standard deductions, and personal exemptions for TY 2020. Notable changes: , , , , , , , , , and

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 3 sata

    Essentially, the ownership of many U.S. assets would shift from home-grown billionaires to foreign billionaires.

    Poništi
  18. Notable individual income tax changes in 2020: - Arizona - Arkansas - Massachusetts - Michigan - Minnesota - North Carolina - Ohio - Tennessee - Virginia - Wisconsin See more: /6

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. In some states, a large number of brackets are clustered within a narrow income band; Georgia’s taxpayers reach the state’s 6th and highest bracket at $7,000 in annual income. In DC and CA, the top rate kicks in at $1 million. /5

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. Of those states taxing wages, 9 have single-rate tax structures, with one rate applying to all taxable income. Conversely, 32 states and DC levy graduated-rate income taxes, with the number of brackets varying widely by state. Hawaii has 12 brackets, the most in the country. /4

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 43 states currently levy individual income taxes. 41 tax wage and salary income, while 2 states—NH and TN—exclusively tax dividend and interest income. (TN is currently phasing out its Hall Tax) Seven states levy no individual income tax at all: AK, FL, NV, SD, TX, WA, WY. /3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·