I'm sad to see a civil rights advocacy organization approach an issue of such impact with shallow snark. They clearly did not read the original post by my incredible colleague, Antigone Davis, nor comprehend the hard tradeoffs in dealing with revenge porn https://www.facebook.com/fbsafety/posts/1666174480087050 …https://twitter.com/fightfortheftr/status/999720271484350464 …
-
Show this thread
-
Antigone and her team have traveled around the world meeting with victims of NCII (the official term for revenge porn) and advocacy organizations, trying to answer a really tough question: how can we empower victims to stop the spread of nude images.
2 replies 5 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Imagine you are in the situation faced by thousands every year: somebody has intimate images of you and they are threatening to spread them to your friends and family. They might be extorting you for money, more images, or just trying to cause you terrible harm.
1 reply 3 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
What do you do? Having your images posted and then taken down hours later is not an acceptable solution, you want a way to prevent those images from spreading at all or making the jump to a major platform. You need a way to *preemptively* block images from being posted.
4 replies 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @alexstamos
Would it be possible to have a local software hash the pictures and then only upload the hashes? Purely technical question.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Not true; just do human review on match, facebook can prove they already have that image and therefore no additional exposure. They're already committed to paying for staff to review images, now they just review on match instead of submission.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
thought you were on sabattical ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Airport downtime, time for some debates! 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.