This was silly, but if they were good vulnerabilities, the commentary would be useful. Short sellers need customers to respond without providing full details (or they would be fixed, and then the stock market wouldn't care), so experts saying claims are valid would help veracity.
I know, I'm not making this argument, just think it's an interesting discussion. You know my position is full disclosure is optimal, not many people have pushed harder than me for it 
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Well obviously. If you want to discuss the abstract idea of short selling driven by vulnerability research, let me know. I'm not interesting in discussing what these people are doing, because it's stupid.

- 5 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.