This was silly, but if they were good vulnerabilities, the commentary would be useful. Short sellers need customers to respond without providing full details (or they would be fixed, and then the stock market wouldn't care), so experts saying claims are valid would help veracity.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @4Dgifts
It definitely doesn't optimize for public interest, but the counter-argument is that research can cost a lot of money, so they're balancing recouping those costs with informing users about risk. I'm not making that argument btw, just saying what the argument is.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @4Dgifts
Correct, but the stock market doesn't care about disclosed vulnerabilities, so you can't publish. Hiring experts under NDA who can confirm the impact, severity, exposure, etc seems like logical solution. Then you can warn customers risk exists, and hope market pressures vendor.
1:00 PM - 13 Mar 2018
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.