Paying once for first blood and then in a lottery for the duplicates. Yay/Nay?https://twitter.com/mik235/status/946132300646858752 …
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @mik235
Lottery, but maybe reward should also be reduced to discourage colusion.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sirdarckcat @mik235
I think the current approach is optimal, the obvious attack against a lottery is to always report issues through a dozen pseudonyms to give yourself the best odds. Even for split, no downside to reporting dozen times to reduce share of other reporter, no?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Correct, if you report a dozen times, other finders get a smaller share. This screws up other people, but provides no financial incentive to the cheater.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sirdarckcat @mik235
I don't understand, the bug is reported by two people, but I report it using ten personas. Don't I get total/11 * 10, and the other person gets total/11?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso @sirdarckcat
If it's a $1024 prize for unique, it's a $2 prize each if 9 report it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think that does remove incentive for collusion, but seems unfair to the first reporter who saw his bounty shrink because vendor couldn't fix it fast enough.
-
-
This assumes we double rewards. We would pay first finder on triage and dupes on fix.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.