I don't recall screaming. Nor using all caps to indicate such.
-
-
So what about that danger Gilles, or are we going to switch to discussing diction after you just dropped a baseless accusation on me?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm all in favor of disclosing vulnerabilities... But there's a nice way to do it... and a not so nice way. Responsibility is high.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Gilles, focus. You said people are in danger, that sounds urgent. Let's hear it.
3 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
If you want to complain about whether stating the truism, "software has bugs" is nice or not, it can wait until the danger has passed.
1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes -
Silence? OK, but you at least have a persuasive argument for why "bugs exist in software" should qualify as vulnerability disclosure, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Here is one for you, "it is well known that ignorance is bliss, so saying that software isn't perfect unfairly deprives people of bliss".
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Syllogisms don't make an argument. Though they are fun to read.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I guess my fake argument isn't as good as your imaginary argument? OK, well, can I at least get an apology for the "danger" accusation?
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Only if you accept that uncontrolled disclosure can put users at risk...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Geez Gilles, you don't have an argument for why "bugs exist" should be considered disclosure and you didn't like my fake one. I give up lol.
-
-
I would have responded to your previous response but you deleted it before I could.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Cool, is that your counterargument? "You replaced a tweet, QED". You certainly seem to know what you're talking about, you can do better.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.