a) is not drama, is criticism. b) am not criticising THAT he reports it, but HOW he goes about doing so. Important difference.
-
-
Replying to @AlecMuffett @gravax and
You are causing drama by imposing your idea of how disclose should work like on others and openly attack those who don't follow your idea
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
-
Replying to @gravax @AlecMuffett and
I have the long standing position that whoever finds the bug should do whatever he wants with it.
2 replies 5 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @i0n1c @AlecMuffett and
At the risk of putting users in danger if there is no current patch available for it?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gravax @AlecMuffett and
I see you are one of the ppl who believe vulnerabilities only exist between report and patch and therefore reporter creates risk not vendor
1 reply 3 retweets 31 likes -
-
Think before making accusations. Users were safe yesterday, I said something vague, and now users are in danger. Does that make sense?
6 replies 17 retweets 71 likes -
You have fallen into the logical trap of thinking vulnerability researchers create insecurity. In fact, we *expose* existing insecurity.
8 replies 90 retweets 251 likes -
1) Expose vulnerability 2) Don't give the whole world tools to exploit it 3) Give the vendor a chance to fix it before bad guys use it
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Is that what you think happened here? Gilles, before u make horrible accusations against strangers on the internet, maybe do some research?
-
-
Before you make horrible assumptions... Sure. :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What assumptions am I making? You listed what you thought happened, and you're completely incorrect. Tell me where the danger is.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes - 21 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.