You signed up for that this weekend, they didn't. And it's not just twitter for them.
-
-
Isn't that argument basically "vulnerability researchers create insecurity"? In fact, vulnerability researchers expose insecurity.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Not at all, nor have I said that - I said the opposite if you go back to my earlier replies. This, however, is inactionable.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It's similar to when the Badlock marketing people said "bad bug found, you will find out in a month." No one could do anything but fret
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But why fret at all? You guys are professionals you can't let every Joe with a "Omg bug!" comment stir the pot so poorly. :-/
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DonAndrewBailey @NerdPyle
In all fairness
@taviso isn't "every Joe" though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
But he's saying the Badlock people did, and they absolutely were every Joe. :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Okay but I still don't see Pyle's question of "What did this achieve" answered. For the record am not taking sides, want an open discussion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well Tavis responded that, to him, it helps open up the discussion on transparency.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Everyone knows there are vulnerabilities in Windows; announcement of another doesn't probably open up the transparency discussion more.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't understand your point, If everyone knows, then what is the problem? I don't think everyone does know, but I would like them to.
-
-
Just trying to understand the arguments from both sides. Most sensible counter-argument thus far was about value add of a vague announcement
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.