Yep, they're all terrible. I think Defender is the least terrible, but that's not saying a great deal.
-
-
-
do you have a second least terrible as far as increased attack surface?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nice find, glad they fixed it. But screenshot suggests would create SSL false positives, not false negatives right?
-
Oh, wait, I take it that's because Kaspersky also checks the "commonName" as you added today?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
would it be that hard for anti virus vendors to write proper browser plugins rather than doing MITM,
@taviso? -
No, that's what the majority of them do.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have seen issues with FTPs connections via Filezilla with Kaspersky (I am wondering if this is related) https://wiki.filezilla-project.org/ENETUNREACH_with_Kaspersky …
-
Hmm, seems worth investigating. I'll see if I can reproduce, if there are any security consequences I'll report it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
why would you programmatically identify a certificate by the fingerprint? Isn't that like missing the point
-
Yes, but it's a common kind of missing it. Devs assuming that the human-readable form of a thing is canonical.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.