His argument is that since AV can't be perfect, it's useless. So, AV with vulns is harmful.
-
-
Replying to @VessOnSecurity @CarlGottlieb and
And let's just ignore the millions of cases where AV has helped. It can't always help, so..
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VessOnSecurity @taviso and
But that argument would mean all imperfect products, research & researchers are useless
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarlGottlieb @taviso and
Yeah. I never understood why he doesn't find medicine useless, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VessOnSecurity @CarlGottlieb and
Haha. AV is "imperfect" in the same way that a sieve is an imperfect boat.
3 replies 5 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @taviso @VessOnSecurity and
Or keeping the medical analogy, AV is to security what homeopathy is to medicine.
5 replies 17 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @justinschuh @taviso and
Antibiotics anyone? Helps, but has drawbacks and not a cure all.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CybersecRobert @justinschuh and
sigh.. keep on stretching a shitty metaphor.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ygjb @justinschuh and
Don't hate the metaphor, hate the deficient and ineffective security tool.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CybersecRobert @ygjb and
The metaphor is wrong. Period. Please find me a CISO that advises no AV.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
blah blah blah, bloodletting analogy. #unsubscribe
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.