The same product which makes it more vulnerable also makes the system less vulnerable to other attacks. Fact. @taviso
-
-
Replying to @Jindroush @taviso
No. AVs protect users from themselves in some OSes. In secure OSes are meaningless. Example: iOS.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Jindroush @taviso
that's another thing. But it's called social engineering.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Jindroush @taviso
"click me" doesn't apply (without 2 to 3 exploits) to iOS. phishing, scamming, ... cannot be solved with technology.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
technology can help, but not solve the problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Jindroush @matalaz
If u use AV, you still can't run untrusted exe. But now you have lots of new attack surface. You've made things worse.
5 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @taviso @Jindroush
AV is not so that you can run untrusted exe. It's to prevent you from running it & try to protect when you do by accident
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's *exactly* what your industry claims.pic.twitter.com/d4JrZm65Q4
-
-
Replying to @taviso @Jindroush
I'm not responsible for what the marketroids do, nor do I condone it. When I was in the industry I did my best to stop it
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.