I do not argue, and never argued the existence of the bugs. I argue the conclusions, which are wrong @taviso @VessOnSecurity
-
-
And this whole thread was started because of MS tactic of replacing faster/better products with their worse product
@matalaz -
At least two independent third party researchers with good quality credentials disagree with you. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If that was high-quality audited and sandboxed attack surface, fine. But you don't care. That's the problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Situation is: Untrusted code on plain OS, or being saved from some untrusted code on plain OS, with some add attack surface.
-
I don't want to have this debate with you - I'm explaining why you should start caring about the quality of the code you ship.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
AV is not so that you can run untrusted exe. It's to prevent you from running it & try to protect when you do by accident
-
That's *exactly* what your industry claims.pic.twitter.com/d4JrZm65Q4
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Where 'worse' means from my point of view as 'having less protection for the user against opportunistic malware & stuff'
@matalazThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.