@geekable @dinodaizovi Correct, I didn't...because it's not true?
-
-
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi@geekable Ah, I understand now. We differ on how to calculate security. You count total pwned users, but this is naive. 1/21 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso
@dinodaizovi@geekable This means trojan warez with 10M users is more critical than a commercial iOS exploit used to own Austrian diplomat.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @geekable
@geekable@dinodaizovi You seem touchy. Let's end the discussion here :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @geekable
@geekable@dinodaizovi As I was just explaining, in my opinion the latter. I was explaining where we differ so you understand my argument.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso
@geekable@dinodaizovi 1/3 I guess this discussion can be summarized "some people are willing to trade opportunistic attacks to prevent1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso
@geekable@dinodaizovi 2/3 targeted attacks, others will trade targeted attacks to prevent opportunistic attacks".1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@geekable @dinodaizovi 3/3 I'm in the former camp, you're in the latter :)
-
-
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@taviso@geekable I accept your ethos and goals but I just don't agree that your strategy is effective towards advancing them.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes - 14 more replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.