@dinodaizovi Agreed, because attackers can't buy vulns from exploit vendors (!!), so if good guys would just be quiet we would all be safe!
-
-
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi Yeah, because exploit vendors are usually dumb, and good guys are better off remaining in blissful ignorance. So be quiet!!1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi Now you can make an informed decision. You can contact your vendor, take mitigating steps, etc.2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi If your car has a design flaw, you don't want to know about it because more information makes the decision more complicated?2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi That seems like a different debate. This debate is should people be allowed to know about flaws in the products they use?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@dinodaizovi I think you believe we should make choices for dumb users. Do you feel the same way about legal, financial, medical decisions?
-
-
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@taviso I'm not clear on is how you are making the point for non-technical users to make that choice? Unless you mean making more malware.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.