Perhaps Google's right hand would care to release such a product to protect users from increased exploitation caused by their left hand?
-
-
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi I know right, If it wasn't for blabbermouth researchers everybody would be 100% secure.2 replies 6 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi No, I agree, it's best to not know about it! At least when you don't know you feel like you're secure, even if you're not.2 replies 6 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi Agreed, because attackers can't buy vulns from exploit vendors (!!), so if good guys would just be quiet we would all be safe!1 reply 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi Yeah, because exploit vendors are usually dumb, and good guys are better off remaining in blissful ignorance. So be quiet!!1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@taviso There is a space, believe it or not, between silence and fully public broadcast. Some people call it "discretion."1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes
@dinodaizovi So when you sell an exploit to a customer, you're being "discreet". If I warn people about a bug, I'm being indiscreet? Got it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.