This is a really odd point. We both agree there are huge benefits to open source, right? But you're saying the binaries also also have to be reproducible, because maybe they're hiding some proprietary code in there? Um, can't you just verify there is no additional functionality?
Obviously you can have source code without reproducible builds, what a ridiculous thing to say?
-
-
In practice you *don't* have source code without repro builds. You have approximate source code that differs from the actual source the binary was built from in various ways for various reasons.
- 16 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
