Until we have a wide adoption of encrypted SNI, you can't hide from the ISP anyway, making DoH a net loss for privacy.
You're saying it's a safer default to use an entity known to behave badly, than to use an entity that has qualified for TRR and is legally bound to good behaviour....?
I mean, nobody is arguing shouldn't be allowed to shoot yourself in the foot, but default... ?
-
-
I'm saying it is safer to not centralise everyone's browsing metadata at a single company, no matter which. BTW: Does that "legally bound" claim you mention include non-US citizens?
-
Is using lots of badly behaving providers better than using a few trusted and vetted providers? Your citizenship status is not relevant....(wut??!?!?!). This does not seem like a rational question.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.