Neither, my data has been stolen, I stopped caring about everything you said after that? That's the point, you're focussed on something really weird.
Cool, so the scenario that proves anti-persistence is valuable is: Attacker only has an exploit that requires physical proximity, they can't repeat it (for some reason), and only wants data that doesn't exist yet (for some reason), and that data won't exist for over a year?
-
-
The reason the time matters is the only way anti-persistence makes a difference is if you have regular reboots. Users do not like, but will tolerate monthly reboots (e.g. patch tuesday), so we need a common scenario where that mitigates the attack to justify this mitigation, yes?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.