U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
From the portal advisory: "A successful exploit could also allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks and decrypt confidential information on user connections to the affected software."
It is weird that the official advisory is so focussed on code signing.
My feelings exactly. It's like putting a warning label of "this product may contain nuts" then in small print "also, it contains a high dosage of cyanide".
It kind of makes sense? Code signing most tangibly affects the default install, running no code from any third-party, letting you spoof MSFT, and thus most affects them.
But it’s the TLS bits that will have the lasting impact on third party code, which is unbounded in impact 
But almost nobody cares about code signing. Most won't even notice if an executable isn't even signed at all.
They buried the lede. Easier to claim the effect is lower bc you still have secure transport of the binaries and ppl shouldn't install random binaries, etc. TLS being broken is a _way_ more problematic thing to say, so it comes second and smaller. NSA Advisory is opposite.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
