Personally, I'm a huge fan of this change, because it creates a strong incentive for vendors to patch sooner rather than later. And when you're trying to improve an ecosystem, incentive structure is a make or break decision.https://twitter.com/itswillis/status/1214595438113886209 …
-
-
I did just note that "time-to-patch data will always be available and provides exactly that insight." But, you should really just come into the office so we can have this discussion in person.pic.twitter.com/TFyshNNAQB
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Future business: they might not know about this one now, but if they learn about it later (particularly by being directly harmed by it), then they won't be a repeat customer.
-
That's a very big picture hand wavy reason though right? Patching is expensive, disruptive and unpopular, and vendors aren't usually blamed for exploits (e.g. eternalblue). That's some expensive good will, no?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Earning and retaining their trust, and also avoiding lawsuits. Which is why lots of vendors (MS, Google, Amazon...) have been doing it for years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.