Thanks for the feedback. I'm sorry you feel that way. That said I respect your departure from the conversation. That said, I don't think your work will be impacted in any way.
-
-
-
Replying to @taviso @uncl3dumby and
Multiple people have already decided to not publish to the open internet, and so that's all victories in the path to a better model. Thanks again for the quick thread. If you take nothing else away, OSTs are not dependent on a software bug, which is your focus.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @anthomsec @QW5kcmV3 and
I think security tools will survive, as they have after every previous debate. Maybe I don't understand security tools (?) and this is the one, so good luck with that.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @taviso @uncl3dumby and
As I mentioned, I appreciate your feedback. OSTs are not dependent on a bug. Some percentage of people will always do whatever they want to do. This is security; there's no absolutes, and there's no finish line. Only winning, losing, and lost. Thanks again for the dialogue.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anthomsec @QW5kcmV3 and
I should start leaving shivs all over every city I visit and see what happens when my lawyers cite infosec Twitter. I'm sure I'll go fine. (Narrator: it won't.)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What is the shiv in your scenario? I think you can leave copies of nmap all over town and nobody would care. You might get cited for littering, but that's it.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
nmap isn't an OST.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anthomsec @QW5kcmV3 and
Pretty sure you're not in charge of what qualifies as a tool, and a reasonable person would agree it's useful as a security tool in an offensive context.
3 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Nuance is what enables categorization which is why people are scared of definition. People have been "but what about PSEXEC" since the onset of the conversation, but the conversation is a lot more mature than that at this stage. I didn't think you still wanted to engage though.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I think that conversation predates psexec.... By about a century 
-
-
I swore you waived off from the conversation, but I'm glad you're continuing. I don't believe we should suggest this issue was solved 100 years ago. If that was the case, people wouldn't be so aggravated and trying to shut down my point of view. Others see that.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
