You agree that two people can find a vulnerability, right? I keep getting the impression that you believe you can control who has access to an exploit, but that isn't the case.
I think you're saying if you drop the market price of exploits, you believe people will still produce them at the same rate?
-
-
I am saying the market is much larger than the US market. If the USG military budget is around 600b and the cybercrime marker is around 600b that suggests there is plenty of cash to go around for zero days. The global military budget is ~2t.
-
Hmm, this seems like a really weak argument, you're trivializing the US involvement in the exploit market by bundling it with all global cybercrime. The reality is that the US is a huge player in exploit markets, why minimize that?
- 35 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s not clear that even if you managed to get the US gov to actually stop their buy-side activity that it would drop market pricing. Plenty of payers are left for a price competition.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.