To be fair building in backdoors also puts people at risk.
-
-
I’m not willing to make any tradeoffs like that at all. I’m hoping that people like you will make things more secure, and along the way governments learn how to police the way they did in 1990 before smartphones.
-
Even if I believed in tradeoffs, there’s no party to make the deal with.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
How about a third option: Being OK with the idea that some data might never be accessible to police agencies, even if it means a guilty person might get away with a crime.
-
I mean, that is implicitly one of the options, right? The option I'm not willing to accept is "we don't need key escrow, because you can just hoard more vulnerabilities", because I worry that is putting more people at risk.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
i mean, this is kind of like trying to build a plane and then arguing that the physicists who point out that gravity exists are throwing you under the bus

-
No it isn't, I've already explained how a policy change can either increase the scarcity of exploits, or decrease it. If you're okay with decreasing the scarcity to avoid key escrow, then that is my problem.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
I think some people are, which bothers me. If you're not, then we're probably on the same page (or at least the same chapter!
)