I don't follow sorry, if less exploits will be produced then how will they have more available?
They both have costs, just different costs. For example, presumably key escrow would require judicial approval. I think maybe you're counting costs per-exploit, not per-compromise, because they're pretty cost effective, no?
-
-
by cost I don't necessarily mean $, there's also risk of getting caught, which is an implicit cost you must assume *on each compromise*.
-
Sure, so let's say you buy one exploit for $100k, and compromise 100 targets with it, that's probably a lot cheaper than getting a lawyer in front of a judge for 100 warrants. Still seems like a pretty good deal if you get caught a couple of times, don't you think?
- 56 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.