NaCl only depends on a small subset of the operation for security. Not sure why you keep talking about Spectre/Meltdown, it wasn't really relevant to NaCl (wasn't a free breakout, and you didn't need NaCl to exploit it, but rowhammer was).
-
-
As I said, I'd be happy have a discussion in another medium if you'd like to discuss what I'm saying instead of dropping nice sounding but irrelevant point scoring bon mots. If you want to decline my invitation again and respond with more sarcasm, that's fine too. Your call.
-
I'd be more than happy to discuss it once you've read the paper you're criticizing. I fail to see how pointing out that a relevant errata was actually prevented by a vendor whitelist is point scoring, doesn't that prove that it's useful?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting, I think the Cyrix coma bug would have validated. Cyrix wasn't whitelisted, seems like the only relevant errata either of us can find would have been avoided with a vendor whitelist!

-
I doubt anyone who is still running a Cyrix processor is using it to run Chrome. Likewise for Transmeta. Centaur, in contrast, is still coming out with new parts:https://centtech.com/ai-technology/
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
