I’m really glad Olivia is covering NCII and looking at solutions.
She was one of only a couple of journalists who covered the 2017 FB pilot from the perspective of victims (the other being @kateconger). Most of the media just enjoyed posting snarky hot takes.https://twitter.com/oliviasolon/status/1196422970127867905 …
I'm really trying very hard to imagine how your system is harder to abuse, but I can't see it. With your system, a human has to look at every nude to verify it. With my system, they only have to look on match, when facebook already has it and abuse is 100% happening. 
-
-
Ok, I gotta go work and can’t spend all day with your armchair quarterbacking. All I can ask of the media is to not create perverse incentives. You happen to work with one of the largest online safety teams on the planet. Give it a shot.
-
...and we're back to this. The only problems I've seen you talk about both have really solid solutions. If there's such a clearly unsolvable problem why not just explain it, I'm sure the media will be less snarky when experts confirm it..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One difference I can see: If people send you a hash and it matches a non-nude, you don't know whether it was an accidental hit or a hostile attempt at censoring the non-nude (in which case you can penalize them). If they send you the actual nude, you know it was accidental.
-
I'm sure Facebook doesn't like to talk about retaliation, but the ability to retaliate changes the whole dynamics of their interaction with users.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.