that's a topic change. we were discussing single points of failure. centralized dns offers many more points of failure.
The people arguing against it are going to be on the wrong side of history. In five years they'll remember how they argued that plaintext is good for privacy, and it's dangerous not to let the your isp or hotel wifi monitor your activity, they're gonna look real silly. 
-
-
I'm not an ISP or even a public resolver host, but I use private DNS to implement uncommon per-domain routing method for VPN, with my custom DNS resolver, for censorship circumvention. https://antizapret.prostovpn.org/tech.html
-
Cool, and nobody has proposed anything that would prevent you from doing that. You only have to worry if you want to snoop on or interfere with queries from machines that you don't own and/or don't have permission from the owner. Those people do have to worry

- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not arguing against DNS encryption, I'm arguing against its implementation. So, Chrome will use DoH if the public resolver configured system-wide supports it. But are there many users who configure DNS on their PC, not on router? Mobile OS don't allow to change DNS at all.
-
I don't understand the question, of course you can configure the DNS on your phone. I don't know how many users do that, rolling these things out takes time.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
